The agenda is clear. Since kids’ physical activity levels are decreasing. Finding ways to increase them would be a smart move.
When it comes to creating change in kids, schools are the most obvious asset. Plenty of contact time, people on the payroll, and a place to do it.
To improve the physical literacy of young children the assumption is that we need to spend more time focused on physical activities in schools.
The difficult part is creating enough qualified teachers to deliver the agenda. The teachers are underqualified and the kids are suffering. So the obvious solution is to drop in specialised staff.
The idea embedded in the argument is that content is more important than the environment.
Arguably, The Government in pursuit of its agenda has under committed on either and underspent on both.
Thinking past the agenda of others.
Is school the best place to raise active, healthy, and curious kids?